At the invitation of PDE, I spent Thursday morning in
Harrisburg as they kicked off the first of their “Stakeholder Sessions” that
will help inform the Department as they develop the regulations for the
implementation of the recently passed ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act).
This was not at all unlike the recent study groups
formed by PSBA (one of which I co-chaired) for essentially the same purpose -
with the hope that we could get out in front of the issue before the new
regulations get set in stone.
Introductions and an overview were followed by a panel
discussion on the opportunities and challenges provided by the new law. Some
concerns were expressed about possibility that we might now forget about the
‘achievement gap’, which prompted me to jot down a question on the provided
notecard.
Among the pile of cards that were submitted, mine was
the one that was picked. My question: “We
have known about the achievement gap for decades, long before No Child Left
Behind. What are the proven strategies for reducing the achievement gap, and
why aren’t we implementing them?” “Ooooooh,” murmured the crowd.
What prompted me to write the question is that
education policy-makers have been trying to sell this nonsense for years. “At
least NCLB told us that we had an achievement gap,” they say.
Bull. Anyone who was paying attention knew long before
NCLB that we had an ‘achievement gap’. Yet schools were actually punished for
failing to close the gap, which always struck me as deeply hypocritical, since
no one at the U.S. Dept. of Ed, or PDE, had any suggestions for what to do
about it!
The first three panelists responded to my question by
mumbling something along the lines of “it’s complicated”, and then the last
panelist said some interesting things, mentioning three issues: 1) Equity
(noting that Pennsylvania has the least equitable public education funding
mechanism in the country.) 2) School climate, and 3) the Cultural
Competency of Teachers.
That got my attention, since it’s pretty close to what
I might have said. In addition, I saw the last two items as central to any
strategy for reducing the achievement gap in State College. (And yes, we have
one.)
Then on to the breakout session on “assessment.” After
having everyone in the room briefly describe their ideal of what good
assessment should look like – and we were all pretty much in agreement - the
facilitator asked for ideas. I pointed out that we had just heard that
“computer adaptive tests” aligned to state standards were now permissible under
ESSA; that many of us (including State College) were already using these tests to
provide useful, immediate information to teachers, and that we could take that
data, aggregate it and dis-aggregate it as need be, send it to PDE, and we would
be done with it!
We could fulfill the
requirements of ESSA without doing anything we weren’t already doing! And we could
toss the ridiculously inappropriate, expensive, useless and time-consuming PSSA
exams in the trash.
The idea that the possibility of actually eliminating
the dreaded PSSAs was within our grasp seemed to go over the head of most
people in the room. Partly, I think, it was too-good-to-be-true, and partly
people were stuck on the idea that they had to ask permission from PDE: “Tell
us if we’re allowed to do this.” But
there were a few who seemed to get it, and I hope they carry the torch through
the summer meetings.
My work done there,J, I slid into the
tail end of the “accountability” breakout group. I was there just long enough
to support someone who was pointing out that our primary ‘accountability’ is to
the people in our community. (Who else is there?) Then another person sitting nearby asked
whether there were tools available to accurately measure ‘school climate’.
Apparently, there had been a lot of concern expressed that school climate – now
an approved measure of accountability under ESSA – was not concrete enough to measure
accurately.
This gave me the opportunity, as a member of the
National School Climate Council, to inform the group that yes, good tools had
been developed for measuring school climate. (Examples: the level of student
engagement, the degree to which teachers feel respected, whether parents feel
connected, etc..) The issue of whether
it is appropriate to incorporate school climate as a component of
‘accountability’ was left to another day.